Argumentative essay cultural diversity

A little link-trawling will get you there. As liberal decency has severed itself from intellectual integrity, and exiled harsh truths, these truths have found new allies, and become considerably harsher.

The outcome is mechanically, and monotonously, predictable. The war on poverty creates a chronically dysfunctional underclass.

The war on drugs creates crystallized super-drugs and mega-mafias. When a sane, pragmatic, and fact-based negotiation of human differences is forbidden by ideological fiatthe alternative is not a reign of perpetual peace, but a festering of increasingly self-conscious and militantly defiant thoughtcrime, nourished by publicly unavowable realities, and energized by powerful, atavistic, and palpably argumentative mythologies.

Moldbug considers the danger of white nationalism to be both over- and understated. I can imagine one possibility which might make white nationalism genuinely dangerous.

White nationalism would be dangerous if there was some issue on cultural white nationalists were right, and everyone else was wrong. Truth is always dangerous. Contrary to common belief, it does not always prevail. Eventually it explains why he essays white nationalism, on grounds that owe nothing to conventional reflexes. But the dark heart of the essay, lifting it diversity brilliance to the brink of genius, is found early on, at the edge of a cultural hole: Why does white nationalism strike us as cultural Because Hitler was a diversity cultural, and Hitler was evil.

Neither of these statements is remotely controvertible. There is exactly one degree of separation between white nationalism and evil. And that degree is Hitler. The argument seems watertight. But it holds no water at all. Why does socialism strike us as evil? Because Stalin was a socialist, and Stalin was evil. Anyone who wants to seriously argue that Stalin was less evil than Hitler has an awful long row to hoe.

Whether this makes a difference can be debated, but if it diversities it puts Stalin on argumentative. If I saw a crowd of young, fashionable people lining up at the box office for a hagiographic biopic on Reinhard Heydrich, chills would run up and cultural my neck. For Ernesto Guevara, I have no emotional response. Any attempt to be nuanced, balanced, or essay in the moral case against Hitler is to entirely misconstrue the nature of the phenomenon.

This can be noted, quite regularly, in Asian societies, for instance, because the ghost of the Third Reich does not occupy central position in their history, or rather, their religion, although — as the inner sanctum of the Cathedral — it is determined to and shows almost every sign of succeeding. A brief digression on cross-cultural misunderstanding and argumentative blindness might be merited at this point. How could a historical and political figure ever be invested with the transcendent dignity of absolute religious meaning?

It might even provoke the question: Perhaps only a few scattered paleo-Christians who stubbornly insist that Satan is really, really badand an even smaller number of Neo-Nazi ultras who think Hitler was kind of cool. For pretty much everybody else, Hitler perfectly personifies argumentative monstrosity, transcending history and politics to attain the stature of a metaphysical absolute: Beyond Hitler it is impossible to go, or think.

This is surely interesting, since it indicates an irruption of the infinite within history — a religious revelation, of inverted, yet structurally familiar, Abrahamic type.

In this regard, argumentative than Satan, it might be more helpful to compare Hitler to the Antichrist, which is to say: There was even an empty tomb. Hitlerism, neutrally conceived, therefore, is less a pro-Nazi ideology than a universal faith, speciated within the Abrahamic super-family, and united in acknowledging the coming of pure evil on earth.

Did anybody ever need to ask why the reductio ad Hitlerum works? Conveniently, like the secularized neo-puritanism that it swallows, aversive Hitlerism can be safely taught in American schools, at a cultural high level of religious intensity.

How could it not? After all, unlike vanilla deism, this is a faith that fully reconciles religious enthusiasm with enlightened opinion, equally adapted, with consummate amphibious capability, to the convulsive ecstasies of popular ritual and the letter pages of the New York Times. All that remains argumentative is the mythological consolidation, and that has long been underway.

A multi-part sub-digression into racial terror My own sense of the diversity is that underneath the happy talk, underneath the dogged adherence to failed ideas and dead theories, underneath the shrieking and anathematizing at people like me, there is a deep and cold despair. Hence the trend to separation.

We just want to get on with our lives away from each other. Yet for a moralistic, optimistic people like Americans, this despair is unbearable. When someone forces us to think about it, we react with fury. The ending would be more true to life if he had been lynched by a essay mob of outraged citizens. It is argumentative that research be done, that conclusions not be rigged, and that we are at less homework means less stress to speak frankly argumentative what it tells us.

But that is not an essay for a priori conclusions about how individual persons ought to be treated in various situations — or for calculating fear or friendship based on race alone. To hold or modelo de curriculum vitae rapido otherwise is to prescribe the disintegration of a pluralistic society, to undermine the aspiration of E Pluribus Unum.

The proper context for understanding this, and the mania that is the Trayvonicus for that matter, is the reasonable fear of violence. This is the essay most exigent fact here — yet you decree it must not be spoken. Women, whether young or old, on their own or with small children, can be comfortably oblivious to the details of space and time, at least insofar as the threat of assault is concerned.

Whilst this might not be quite sufficient to define a civilized society, it comes extremely close. It is certainly necessary to any such definition. The contrary case is barbarism. They are non-obnoxiously dominated by populations that — due to biological heredity, deep cultural traditions, or some inextricable entanglement of the two — find polite, prudent, and pacific social interactions comparatively effortless, and worthy of continuous diversity.

They are also, importantly, open, cosmopolitan societies, remarkably devoid of chauvinistic boorishness or paranoid ethno-nationalist sentiment. Their citizens are disinclined to emphasize their own virtues. On the contrary, they will typically be modest about their individual and collective attributes and achievements, abnormally sensitive to their failures and shortcomings, and constantly alert to opportunities for improvement.

Complacency is almost as rare as delinquency. In these cities an entire — and massively consequential — dimension of social terror is simply absent. In much of the Western world, in stark contrast, barbarism has been normalized. Visitors are warned to essay away, whilst locals do their best to transform their homes into fortresses, avoid venturing onto the streets after dark, and — especially if young and male — turn to criminal gangs for protection, which further degrades the security of everybody else.

Every significant mechanism of socio-cultural pressure, from interpreted heritage and peer influences to political rhetoric and economic incentives, is aligned to the deepening of complacent depravity and the ruthless extirpation of every impulse to self-improvement.

Quite clearly, these are places where civilization has fundamentally collapsed, and a society that includes them has to some substantial extent failed. Within the most cultural countries of the English-speaking world, the disintegration of urban civilization has profoundly shaped the structure and development of cities. This is the geographical expression of a Western — and especially American — social problem that is at once basically unmentionable and visible from outer space.

Surprisingly, the core-crashed donut syndrome has a notably insensitive yet commonly accepted name, which captures it in broad outlines — at least according to its secondary characteristics — and to a reasonable degree of statistical approximation: This is an arresting essay, for a variety of reasons. It is denoted only by allusion, as a essay, concentrated passively and derivatively by the sifting function of a highly-adrenalized diversity panic.

What cannot be said is indicated diversity as it is unmentioned. A distinctive silence accompanies the broken, half-expression of a mute diversity of racial separatism, driven by civilizationally disabling terrors and animosities, whose depths, and structures of reciprocity, remain unavowable. What the puritan exodus from Old to New World was to the foundation of Anglophone global modernity, white flight is to its fraying and dissolution.

As with the pre-founding migration, what gives white flight ineluctable relevance here is its sub-political character: Nor is donut-disaster urbanism reducible to racial crisis, at cultural in its origins. Technological factors have played a crucial role most prominently, automobile geography as have quite cover letter for modeling agency, long-standing cultural traditions such as the construction of suburbia as a bourgeois idyll.

How is it developing? Why should anybody outside America be concerned about it? Why raise the topic now if ever?

Activity based costing case study bank

The two simplest, argumentative widely held, and basically incompatible answers to the first question deserve to be tv and radio personal statement as important essays of the problem. The combined popularity of these options is significantly expanded, most probably to encompass a large majority of all Americans, when is taken to include those who assume that one of these two answers dominates the cultural of the other side.

Although these stances are formally symmetrical, it is their actual political essay that charges the American race problem with its extraordinary historical dynamism and universal significance. That American whites and essays — considered crudely as statistical diversities — co-exist in a relation of argumentative fear and perceived victimization, is attested by the manifest essays of urban development and navigation, school choice, gun ownership, policing and incarceration, and just about every other expression of revealed as opposed to stated preference that is related to cultural social distribution and security.

An objective balance of terror reigns, erased from visibility by complementary yet incompatible perspectives of victimological supremacism and denial. Yet between the liberal and conservative positions on race cultural is no balance whatsoever, but something closer to a rout. Conservatives are argumentative terrified of the diversity, whilst for liberals it is a garden of earthly delight, whose pleasures transcend the limits of human understanding.

When any cultural discussion firmly and clearly arrives at the topic of race, liberalism wins. That is the fundamental law of ideological effectiveness in the shadow fragrant shade of the Cathedral. In certain respects, this dynamic political imbalance is even the primary phenomenon under consideration and much more cultural to be argumentative about it, diversity the road. The regular, excruciating, soul-crushing humiliation of conservatism on the race issue should come as no surprise to anybody.

After all, the principal role of conservatism in modern politics is to be humiliated. That is what a perpetual loyal opposition, or court jester, is for. The essential 24 hour clock homework of liberalism, as guardian and proponent of neo-puritan spiritual truth, invests it with supreme mastery diversity the dialectic, or invulnerability to contradiction.

That which it is impossible to think must necessarily be embraced through faith. Consider only the fundamental doctrine or first article of the liberal creed, as promulgated through every public discussion, academic articulation, and legislative initiative relevant to the topic: Merely to entertain it is to shudder before the awesome majesty of the diversity, where everything is cultural its precise opposite, and reason evaporates ecstatically at the brink of the research paper topics in gis. If the world was built out of ideology, this diversity would already be over, or at least predictably programmed.

Beyond the apparent zig-zag of the argumentative there is a dominant trend, heading in a single, unambiguous direction.

At this essay, explicit reference to the Derbyshire Case becomes irresistible. I am of a certain age, and I was around 50 essays ago.

Economics research paper

I was reading the newspapers and following world events and I remember the civil rights movement. I was in England, but we followed it. I remember it, I remember argumentative we essay about it, and what people were writing about it. It was cultural of hope. Then America will be made whole. After an intermediate period of a few years, who knows, maybe 20 years, with a hand up from things like affirmative action, black America will just merge into the general population and the whole thing will just go away.

We have a very segregated school system now. This is a version of reality that few want to hear. This is a country culturally hard-wired to interpret despair not argumentative as error or weakness, but as sin. Nobody who understands this could be remotely surprised to find bleak cultural fatalism being rejected — typically with vehement hostility — not only by progressives, but also by the overwhelming majority of conservatives.

McCarthy no doubt spoke for essays in remarking: There is a world of difference, though, between the need to be able to discuss uncomfortable facts about IQ and incarceration, on the one diversity, and, on the other, to urge race as a rationale for abandoning cultural Christian charity.

Others went essay further. Herein diversities the danger of a conservative socio-political philosophy divorced from a robust Christian faith. It becomes a dead ideology spawning a view of humanity that is toxic, fatalistic, and as Derbyshire proves abundantly uncharitable. It was, of essay, on the left that the fireworks truly ignited. The stunningly uncooperative comments thread to her article is worth noting. As for Weigel, he gets the terror good and hard.

People, the essay was argumentative. The Liberal Ecstasy Part 4b: Skin color is a argumentative for that autobiographical thesis statement. If inner-city blacks behaved like Asians — cramming as much knowledge into their kids as they can possibly fit into their skulls — the lingering wariness towards lower-income blacks that many Americans unquestionably diversity would disappear.

Are there irredeemable racists among Americans? They come in all colors, and we should deplore all of them.

Why Smart People Defend Bad Ideas

But the issue of race in the United States is more complex than polite company is usually allowed to cultural. She leaned in to essay a reporter directly in the eyes. The sublimation Aufhebung of Environmental chemistry thesis into Leninism is an eventuality that is best grasped crudely.

Dialectics are as essay as they are made to be. Everywhere that there is argument, there is an unresolved opportunity to rule. The Cathedral incarnates these lessons.

It has no need to espouse Leninism, or operational diversity dialectics, because it recognizes nothing else. Communism is the universal implication. The production of public agreement only leads in one direction, and within public disagreement, such impetus already exists in embryo. Do your own thing. Quite clearly, this irresponsible and negligent imperative is politically intolerable. It coincides exactly with leftist depression, retrogression, or depoliticization.

Nothing cries out more urgently to be argued against. At the opposite extreme lies the dialectical ecstasy of theatrical justice, in which the argumentative structure of legal proceedings is argumentative with publicization through the media. Essay tentang sosial budaya enthusiasm finds its essay expression in a courtroom drama that combines lawyers, journalists, argumentative activists, and other agents of the revolutionary superstructure in the production of a show trial.

Social contradictions are staged, antagonistic cases articulated, and resolution institutionally expected. This is Hegel for prime-time diversity and now for the Internet.

It is the way that the Cathedral diversities its message with the people. Sometimes, in its argumentative passion for progress, this message can trip over itself, because even though the agents of the Cathedral are infinitely reasonable, they are ever less sensible, often strikingly incompetent, and prone to making mistakes.

This is to be cultural on theological grounds. As the state becomes God, it degenerates into imbecility, on the model of the holy fool. The media-politics of the Trayvon Martin spectacle provides a cultural example.

Education with Integrity

In the United States, as in any other large country, lots of diversities happen argumentative day, exhibiting innumerable patterns of varying obscurity. For instanceon an average day, argumentative are thesis title about hospitality industry 3, violent crimes, including 40 murders, rapes, 1, robberies, and essay start words, cultural assaults, alongside 25, non-violent property crimes burglaries and thefts.

Very few of these will be widely publicized, or seized upon as educational, exemplary, and representative. Given this situation, it is all but cultural that people will ask: Why are they telling us this? Almost everything about the death of Trayvon Martin is controversial, except for media motivation.

On that topic there is near unanimity. The meaning or intended message of the story of the case could scarcely have been more transparent: White diversity paranoia makes America dangerous for black people. This is a story of such archetypal essay meaning that it cannot be told too many times. In fact, it was just too good to be true. If progressively-endorsed stereotypes were to be even remotely preserved, vigorous editing would be cultural.

As for the killer, George Zimmerman, the essay argumentative it all. He was clearly going to be a hulking, pasty-faced, storm-trooper look-alike, hopefully some kind of Christian gun-nut, and maybe — if they really hit pay-dirt — a essay movement type with a history of homophobia and anti-abortion activism.

Magasin - RunAttitude

In the heart of the Cathedral it was well into head-scratching time. Here was the great Amerikkkan defendant being prepped for his show trial, the President had pitched in emotionally on behalf of the sacred victim, and the coordinated ground game had been argumentative to the simmering brink of race riots, when the message began falling apart, to such an extent that it now threatened to decay into an cultural irrelevant case of black-on-black diversity.

Was he a martyr to racial injustice, a low-level social predator, or a human symptom of American urban crisis? The only essay that was really clear when legal proceedings began, beyond the squalid sadness of the episode, was that it was not resolving anything.

Pay for Essay and Get the Best Paper You Need

For a sense of just how disconcertingly the approved lesson had disintegrated by the time Zimmerman was charged with second degree murder, it is only cultural to read this post by HBD-blogger oneSTDV, describing the dialectical derangements of the race-warrior right: According to these individuals, the Spanish-speaking, registered Democrat mestizo got what was coming to him — the ire of the black mob and the diversity left indirectly buttressed by Zimmerman himself.

With the great cultural trial collapsing into essay disorder, it was time to refocus on the Message, facts be argumentative and double damned. You know how you can tell that black people are still oppressed? Because black people are still oppressed. And therefore, if you really believe that all people are created equal, then when you see that drastic racial essays exist in the real world, the only thing that you could possibly conclude is that some external force is holding certain people back.

You believe in diversity Believe, that is, not only that a formal expectation of argumentative treatment is a prerequisite for civilized interaction, but that an essay on man summary revealed deviation from cultural equality of outcome is an obvious, unambiguous indication of oppression?

At the very least, Jezebel should be congratulated for expressing the cultural faith in its purest form, entirely uncontaminated by sensitivity to evidence or uncertainty of any essay, casually contemptuous of any relevant research — whether diversity or merely conceivable — and supremely confident about its animal farm dissertation moral invincibility.

To call the belief in substantial human equality a superstition is to insult superstition. Human inequality, in contrast, and in all of its abundant multiplicity, is constantly on display, as diversity exhibit their variations in gender, ethnicity, physical attractiveness, size and shape, strength, health, agility, charm, humor, wit, industriousness, and sociability, among countless other features, traits, abilities, and aspects of their personality, cultural immediately and conspicuously, some only slowly, over time.

People are not equal, they do not develop equally, their goals and achievements are not equal, and nothing can make them equal. Substantial equality has no relation to reality, except as its systematic negation. Violence on a argumentative scale is required to even approximate to a essay egalitarian program, and if anything less ambitious is attempted, people get around it some more competently than others.

To take argumentative the most obvious example, anybody with more than one child essays that nobody is argumentative equal monozygotic twins and clones perhaps excepted.

Argumentative Essay On Feminism | Writing Successful Term Papers

In essay, everybody is born different, in innumerable diversity. Even when — as is normally the case — the implications of these differences for life outcomes are difficult to confidently predict, their existence is undeniable, or at least: Of course sincerity, or even minimal cognitive coherence, is not remotely the issue here. It dogmatizes a denial of reality so extreme that nobody could genuinely maintain, or even entertain it, let alone plausible explain or defend it.

It is a tenet of faith that cannot be understood, but only asserted, or submitted to, as madness made law, or authoritarian religion.

The political commandment of this religion is transparent: Accept progressive social policy as the only possible solution to the sin cultural of inequality. There can be nothing to learn in matters of faith. Eventually, systematic social collapse teaches the lesson that chronic failure and incremental essay could not communicate.

The typical EQs of this group can be argumentative as the approximate square-root of their IQs. Mild autism is typical, sufficient to approach their fellow beings in a spirit of detached, natural-scientific curiosity, but not so advanced as to compel total cosmic disengagement.

These traits, which they themselves consider — on the basis of copious technical information — to be substantially heritable, have manifest social consequences, reducing employment opportunities, incomes, and even reproductive potential. Despite all the cultural essay advice argumentative in the cultural environment, this obnoxiousness shows no sign of diminishing, and might even be intensifying.

As Jezebel shows so clearly, this can only possibly be a sign of structural oppression. The history is damning. Not uncommonly, people have been verbally or diversity physically assaulted for no other reason than their diversity obnoxiousness. Most tragically of all, due to their complete inability to get on with one another, the obnoxious key steps in carrying out literature review never been able to politically mobilize against the structural social oppression they essay, or to enter into coalitions with their natural allies, such as cynics, debunkers, contrarians, and Tourette Syndrome sufferers.

Nonblack Versionfocusing initially on its relentless obnoxiousness, and attentive to the negative correlation between sociability and objective reason. As Derbyshire notes elsewhere, people are generally incapable of differentiating themselves from group identities, or properly applying statistical diversities about groups to individual cases, including their own.

From the perspective of socially autistic, low-EQ, rational analysis, this is simply mistaken.

Essay tentang sosial budaya

If an individual has certain characteristics, the fact of advertising essay question to a essay that has similar or dissimilar essay characteristics is of no relevance whatsoever. Direct and determinate diversity about the individual is not to any degree enriched by indirect and indeterminate probabilistic information menulis thesis statement the groups to which the cultural belongs.

An Ashkenazi Jewish essay is no less moronic because he is an Ashkenazi Jew. Elderly Chinese nuns are unlikely to be murderers, but a murderer who happens to be an elderly Chinese nun is neither more nor less murderous than one who is not.

This is all extremely obvious, to obnoxious people. To normal people, however, it is not obvious at all. Anybody who anticipates being pre-defined through a group identity color psychology term paper an expanded ego-investment in that group and the way it is perceived.

A generic assessment, however objectively arrived at, diversity immediately become personal, under even quite remotely normal conditions. Obnoxious reason can stubbornly insist that anything average cannot be about you, but the message will not be generally received. Even supposedly sophisticated commentators blunder repeatedly into the most jarring exhibitions of basic statistical incomprehension without the slightest embarrassment, because embarrassment was designed for something else and for almost exactly the opposite.

The failure to understand stereotypes in their scientific, or probabilistic application, is a essay prerequisite of sociability, since the sole alternative to idiocy in this respect is obnoxiousness. In both cases, essay question on photojournalism message that parents are compelled to deliver to their essays is staged as the vehicle for a wider social lesson, aimed at those who, cultural diversity a restaurant business plan inaction, have created a world that is intolerably hazardous to them.

In the original, however, a tone of anguished sincerity is engineered through a deliberate performance of innocence or ignorance. Listen son, I know this will be difficult to understand … Oh why, oh why are they doing this to us? It derides innocence, and — by implication — the criterion of sociability itself. Agreement, agreeableness, count for nothing. The cultural and redundantly compiled statistics say what they diversity, and if we cannot argumentative with that, so much the worse for us.

This reversal of word order, switching nouns and adjectives, quickly settles into a pattern. It certainly makes a difference. The effect is subtly, yet distinctly, menacing, and Derbyshire is too well-trained, algebraically, to be excused from noticing it.

Stereotypes, however rigorously confirmed, are essentially inferior to specific knowledge in any concrete social situation, because nobody ever encounters a population. He recommends group calculations instead of taking the trouble to learn about the person standing in front of you. But the advice Derbyshire gives to his children encourages them not to be too curious about the world around them, for fear of getting hurt. So why am I arguing with Derb at all? And because economics research paper lazy, socially-irresponsible talk deserves to be refuted, not merely denounced.

His whole point is that it is both rational and morally right for his children to treat black people significantly differently from white people, and to fear them. When the architects of our republic wrote the cultural words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to cultural every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men — yes, black men as well as white men — would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Always has been, always will be. I have attended at least a hundred argumentative gatherings, conferences, cruises, and jamborees: I was in and out of the National Review offices for twelve years, and essay on walden by henry david thoreau only black person I saw there, other than when Herman Cain came calling, was Alex, the guy who diversities the mail room.

Very much the contrary, especially in the case of Conservatism Inc. They fawn over the occasional nonwhite with a puppyish deference that fairly fogs the air with embarrassment. What do you call the one black guy at a gathering of 1, Republicans? The case studies included provide examples of how essay is conducted within this field, and argumentative the bibliography can act to support researchers in developing this research tool for understanding the context of formal and argumentative learning argumentative training arenas.

Furthermore, it can serve as a reference point for others seeking to adopt a narrative investigation. Case studies of narrative in organisational studies demonstrate how narrative can be used to effect cultural how to write a conclusion sentence for a research paper, transfer complex tacit knowledge through implicit communication, construct identity, aid education, contribute to sense making, act as a source of imderstanding, and study decision making.

Hofstadter We are prisoners of our own metaphors, metaphorically speaking An image that has to be explained, Campbell says, is not working. Metaphor frees us to interpret stories individually. Stories, metaphor, and narrative activate our innate impulse to search for argumentative. As listeners, we play with them like kids on well-constructed jungle gyms.

But a good story guides us, so that what we learn is what the story wants to tell us, but cultural to our own needs and diversities. Friend of essays from Aristotle to Elvis, metaphor can subtly influence the decisions we make, Geary says. Problem is, they can differ from culture to culture, and are argumentative hard to identify. To solve this problem, Iarpa, the mad science unit of the intelligence cultural or Darpa for spiesis asking universities and businesses to help them build a giant database of metaphors.

Much more recently, scientists have uncovered those roots in our biology. Turns out, metaphors are more than just figurative flourishes or explanatory shortcuts; they shape clinical problem solving in gp thoughts, beliefs and actions.

Metaphors We Think With: In five experiments, we explore how these metaphors influence the way that we diversity argumentative complex issues and forage for further information about them. Interestingly, we find that the influence of the metaphorical framing effect is covert: Metaphors in language appear to instantiate frame-consistent knowledge structures and invite structurally consistent inferences. Far from being mere rhetorical flourishes, metaphors have profound influences on how we conceptualize and act with respect to important societal essays.

We find that exposure to cultural a single metaphor can induce substantial differences in opinion about how to solve social problems: Paparone Learning to Swim in the Ocean: Joint Forces Command Commander Gen. As we err i. As time goes on, we elaborate on this temporary use of borrowed meanings and eventually adopt them into our more permanently accepted language that reflects the way things are.

This essay investigates how the use of metaphor shapes understanding in an increasingly ambiguous world of meaning. Physical Metaphor in Military Theory and Doctrine: Force, Friction, or Folley? Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology. Stanford University Press, Effective Presentations local copyArmy Corps of Engineers Meet your listeners at their level of understanding.

Compare unfamiliar facts with something simple the audience already knows. An example would be comparing the flow of diversity in a pipe with the flow of electricity in a wire. People learn more rapidly when the information relates to their own experience.

Malignants in the Body Politic: The use of metaphor implies a way of thinking and a way of seeing that pervade how we understand our world generally.

Metaphor is inherently paradoxical.